-
Calum Cheyne Promoted to Partner
We are absolutely delighted to announce the upcoming promotion of Calum Cheyne to Partner with the firm, effective 1 January 2023.
-
Sugar Rush | Case by Case (Ep. 50)
Episode 50! What an exciting milestone. We hope you, our valued listeners, enjoy this third case in our trilogy of lookback cases. We’ve been analysing a few old cases to coincide with Luke’s launch of the inaugural International Commodities and Shipping Law at UoW.This week looks back at Compagnie Commerciale Sucres et Denrees v C Czarnikow Ltd [1990] UKHL J1011-2. -
Condition, innominate or will-o’-the wisp? | Case by Case (Ep. 49)
In this second of their trilogy of ‘look-back’ cases, Luke and Calum explore the salient case of Bunge Corporation (New York) v Tradax Export SA (Panama) [1981] APP.L.R. 02/25.Ever wondered why time-based delivery clauses in a commodities sale and purchase contract are (typically) considered to be conditions?Ever wondered what is an innominate term?Ever wondered how to tell the difference between a condition and an innominate term?Ever wondered what is a ‘will-o’-the-wisp’?Listen in for answers and check out our YouTube channel. -
Mash’s Potatoes | Case by Case (Ep. 48)
As Luke prepares to launch the International Shipping and Commodities intensive law course at the University of Wollongong in a couple of weeks, he’s had cause to look back at some leading cases.Back to the 1960s. The Beatles, Civil Rights activism, flares, and… Mash & Murrell Ltd. v Joseph I. Emmanuel, Ltd. [1961].Some law doesn’t stand the test of time (much like poorly ventilated potatoes crossing an ocean). Some law does, as we discuss in this pod. For more, check out our YouTube channel.